The problem
Jobseekers often have fragmented career information, generic CVs and repeated application tasks, while employability organisations struggle to see what activity is actually taking place. Sanctuary HR is being developed to turn that fragmented process into a structured, auditable workflow.
Public candidate experience
- A structured Master Candidate Profile that acts as the source of truth rather than relying on one CV
- CV upload, parsing and improvement based on user-provided or verified information
- Job discovery and matching with a preference for official employer career pages
- Role-specific CV and application preparation
- Application workflow support while the candidate retains responsibility for final submission in the public user experience
Sanctuary's role
Sanctuary HR is an internal Sanctuary technology venture bringing together employability practice, HR workflow design, AI-assisted matching, candidate data architecture and practical application support in a single web platform.
Why this project matters
The platform is intended to make employability support more measurable and more useful: helping candidates present stronger evidence of their capabilities while giving authorised organisations better visibility of progress, applications and outcomes.
What this demonstrates about human–AI delegation
Evidence scope: public product description, reviewed 10 October 2026. Sanctuary HR is live and in active development. The capabilities above are its published product scope, not an independent audit of every feature or evidence of commercial client results.
The published candidate workflow separates AI-assisted preparation from candidate responsibility for final submission. That boundary is relevant to Human–AI Delegation Optimisation: preparation, factual checking and consequential action need distinct owners.
Design constraints and evaluation questions
Career information must remain attributable to the candidate, uncertain matches need review and prepared material needs factual checking. These are design constraints to evaluate, not a claim that every control has been independently verified. No applicant records or private screenshots are published here.
No verified improvement figures are available for this page. Useful evaluation categories would include factual accuracy, correction effort, exception handling, candidate completion and accessibility; hiring outcomes must not be inferred from generated applications.
Read the proposed delegation framework · Discuss Your Workflow